Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 20, with a general score of 94.6 against 86.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and notably heavier phone than Motorola Edge 20, but Samsung managed to build it just a bit thinner anyway. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide very similar operating system features.
The Motorola Edge 20 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 have quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit lower number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, because it has more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.