Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.65 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Nebula Blue | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2021) has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide very similar OS features. Motorola Edge (2021)'s construction is newer, thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Motorola Edge (2021) has a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge (2021) also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro features a screen that is just as good as the Motorola Edge (2021) one, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2021), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge (2021) has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge (2021) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.