Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a global score of 84.7, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 score. Although the Motorola Edge (2022) is a little thicker than the Google Pixel 2 XL, it's just a little lighter and also notably newer. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 2 XL's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Motorola Edge (2022)'s one, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a back camera with a much higher resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates. The Motorola Edge (2022) has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2 XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2 XL, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.