Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ, with an 84.7 score against 82.5. The Motorola Edge (2022) body is much newer, but just a little bit thicker and a little heavier than LG V30S ThinQ. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has the previous 12 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixels density. LG V30S ThinQ's CPU is very similar to the Motorola Edge (2022) one, both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a really longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Motorola Edge (2022) captures much better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with higher video frame rates and a camera in the back with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2022) not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.