Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 84.7 against 81.3. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is way newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is just a little heavier and a little thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Motorola Edge (2022). Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with higher video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola Edge (2022), otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.