Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s global score of 84.7. Despite of the fact LG Velvet is older and a little heavier than the Motorola Edge (2022), it's construction is still just a bit thinner. Motorola Edge (2022) and LG Velvet count with extremely similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a little worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
LG Velvet has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit better performance than LG Velvet. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge (2022) shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a back-facing camera with more megapixels and faster video frame rates. The Motorola Edge (2022) features superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.