Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a global score of 84.7 against 75.8. The Motorola Edge (2022) design is a lot newer, thinner and much lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has the previous 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a screen that is very similar to the display in Motorola Edge (2022), because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite worse pixels amount in each display inch, it also counts with a little bigger display. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 48 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images in low light situations and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in Motorola Edge (2022).
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola Edge (2022) is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.