Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) has a score of 84.7, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is newer, extremely lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge (2022) has a newer 12 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display. The nubia Red Magic 5S has as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Motorola Edge (2022) one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit superior processor than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a little longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
The Motorola Edge (2022) not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.