Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a global score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A41's general score of 81.7. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has a newer 12 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11, providing you a couple nice extra features. Motorola Edge (2022)'s design is a lot newer than Galaxy A41's, but it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a little greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited environments, a better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.