Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), with a overall score of 84.7 against 75.8. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is a lot newer than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, but it's just a little bit heavier and a little thicker. The Galaxy A5 (2017) and Motorola Edge (2022) have quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge (2022) takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light situations and a camera with a way better resolution. The Motorola Edge (2022) has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.