Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is just a bit better than the Galaxy A50, having a global score of 84.7 against 83.8. The Motorola Edge (2022) is a extremely newer phone than Galaxy A50, but it is just a bit heavier and a little thicker. The Motorola Edge (2022) features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has more RAM.
The Motorola Edge (2022) and the Galaxy A50 have similar displays, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little better display pixels density. Motorola Edge (2022) shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A50 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A50. If you want to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A50, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.