Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than Motorola Edge (2022), getting a overall score of 86.6 against 84.7. Galaxy A50s's construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola Edge (2022), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a screen that is just as good as the display in Motorola Edge (2022), because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density. The Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A50s. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a camera that's very similar to the camera in Motorola Edge (2022), although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lower video resolution, a back facing camera with lesser MP and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge (2022) features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.