Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge (2022), having a score of 85.5 against 84.7. Despite of the fact Galaxy A51 is extremely older and just a little heavier than Motorola Edge (2022), it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 features a screen that is just as good as the Motorola Edge (2022) one, because although the Galaxy A51 has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a camera that's just as good as Motorola Edge (2022)'s camera, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a lesser mega pixels camera in the back, a lower video definition and a smaller diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.