Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s global score of 84.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12. Even being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is noticeably older, just a little heavier and a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge (2022).
The Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola Edge (2022) both have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixels quantity per screen inch. Galaxy A51 5G features a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola Edge (2022) feature very similar cameras, although the Galaxy A51 5G has a worse video quality, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos and a worse 48 megapixels resolution camera.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.