Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s global score of 84.7. Even though the Galaxy A52 is better than the Motorola Edge (2022), we must highlight that it is also an older, just a little thicker and heavier phone. Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola Edge (2022) both have incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater display pixels density.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.