Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), getting an 84.7 score against 75.8. The Motorola Edge (2022) body is incredibly newer and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, but it's just a bit thicker. Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit greater count of pixels in each inch of screen and a bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge (2022) has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola Edge (2022) features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.