Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022), with a score of 87.5 against 84.7. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is an extremely older and just a bit heavier phone than Motorola Edge (2022), but Samsung managed to make it just a little bit thinner anyway.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A71. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Motorola Edge (2022) has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The Galaxy A71 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back. Galaxy A71 counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A71 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.