Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022), with a global score of 92.9 against 84.7. Although it's the best we compare here, we must note that it is also extremely older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a CPU that's just as good as the processor in Motorola Edge (2022), and although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a screen that's just as good as Motorola Edge (2022)'s display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit lower pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge (2022) features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs more money than Motorola Edge (2022), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.