Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-08-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 498.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is better than Motorola Edge (2022)'s 84.7 score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12 version, providing the user some additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy Fold design is somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge (2022), although it is much heavier and was released many years before.
Motorola Edge (2022) features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher screen density. Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has more internal storage.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Edge (2022) features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge (2022) takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Edge (2022). If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Edge (2022), letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.