Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than Motorola Edge (2022), getting a 90.8 score against 84.7. Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola Edge (2022), we must note that it's also older, just a little thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 has a screen that is just as good as the Motorola Edge (2022) one, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a little lower pixels number per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger screen. Motorola Edge (2022) captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has higher video frame rate and a much better 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Motorola Edge (2022) one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Edge (2022). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Edge (2022), giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.