Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) has a general score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has a newer 12 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is extremely newer and just a bit lighter than Galaxy Note 5's, but it is also a bit thicker.
Galaxy Note 5 has a better display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per inch of display. Motorola Edge (2022) features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 7 more CPU cores. The Motorola Edge (2022) has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video, better video frame rate and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge (2022) is more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.