Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) has a global score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Even though Motorola Edge (2022) is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is just a little thicker and a bit heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Edge (2022) shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and better video frame rate.
Motorola Edge (2022) features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Motorola Edge (2022) is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.