Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Edge (2022), getting a 98 score against 84.7. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better cellphone than Motorola Edge (2022), we must note that it's also a notably older, just a little bit thicker and much heavier cellphone. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a little bit bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a higher pixels count in each screen inch. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way better video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance is very similar to Motorola Edge (2022)'s battery performance.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Edge (2022). If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Edge (2022), giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.