Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 84.7 score against 75.8. Motorola Edge (2022)'s design is extremely newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Edge (2022) has superior battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy S7 Active, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.