Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is a bit better than Galaxy S8 Active, getting a general score of 84.7 against 81.9. Motorola Edge (2022) is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and thinner than the Galaxy S8 Active. Motorola Edge (2022) has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with better battery performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge (2022) captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a lot better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.