Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 498.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) has a global score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. The Motorola Edge (2022) is a much newer phone, and it's also incredibly thinner and way lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge (2022) has older 12 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a processing unit that's just as good as the Motorola Edge (2022) one, and although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge (2022) takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution camera and a way better (4K) video quality.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola Edge (2022) is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.