Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) has a global score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge (2022) has the newer 12 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, giving a couple nice extra features and better performance. The Motorola Edge (2022) is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also notably lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a display that is just as good as Motorola Edge (2022)'s display, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% larger battery size.
The Motorola Edge (2022) captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge (2022) costs more than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.