Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 498.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s general score of 84.7. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 12 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is incredibly older and a bit heavier than Motorola Edge (2022), it's construction is still somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a bit higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little larger display. The Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster processor than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Motorola Edge (2022) has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Motorola Edge (2022) captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Edge (2022). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Edge (2022), resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.