Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 498.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Edge (2022), with a global score of 92.3 against 84.7. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older and just a bit heavier than Motorola Edge (2022), it's construction is still somewhat thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a bit bigger screen, a quite greater pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge (2022) has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge (2022) takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a back camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is more expensive than the Motorola Edge (2022), but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.