Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Motorola Edge (2022), having a score of 94.6 against 84.7. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and incredibly heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge (2022), but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola Edge (2022) count with quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge (2022) captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a much better resolution back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Edge (2022). If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Edge (2022), giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.