Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s score of 78.5. Although the LG Velvet is noticeably older and a little heavier than Motorola Edge (2024), it's construction is still just a little thinner. The LG Velvet features a way better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. The LG Velvet has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet has a much better camera than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, a much smaller camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have a same size aperture. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with longer battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
LG Velvet is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.