Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-06-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s score of 78.5. Galaxy A50 is an way older device than the Motorola Edge (2024), but it's just a little bit lighter and a little thinner anyway. The Motorola Edge (2024) features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite worse pixels amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A50 features slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge (2024) features longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge (2024) shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.