Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-06-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 overall score. Galaxy A50s is an noticeably older device than the Motorola Edge (2024), but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14.
Motorola Edge (2024) features a better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A50s has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a way smaller back camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a worse 48 MP resolution.
Galaxy A50s has a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.