Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2024), having an 85.5 score against 78.5. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an notably older cellphone than the Motorola Edge (2024), but Samsung was able to make it just a bit thinner and a little lighter.
Galaxy A51 counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A51 captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos or videos in low-light environments, a worse (4K) video definition and a lower 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a little bit better storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge (2024) has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.