Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola Edge (2024), with a 90.8 score against 78.5. Even being the best in this review, the Galaxy A51 5G body is incredibly older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge (2024). Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge (2024) has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit lower screen pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little larger display.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge (2024) has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller camera aperture, a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a much lower photo and video quality, a lower resolution back-facing camera and a worse video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.