Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-06-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 is a better cellphone than Motorola Edge (2024), we must tell that it is also notably older, a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge (2024) has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit lower display pixel density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 takes better videos and photos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A52 features more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Edge (2024) has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.