Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Motorola Edge (2024), having a global score of 91.1 against 78.5. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. Although it's the best device in this review, Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is extremely older, a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Edge (2024).
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A52s shoots better photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A52s features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.