Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than the Motorola Edge (2024), having an 87.5 score against 78.5. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 is much older and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge (2024), it's construction is still just a little bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge (2024) features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a bit better pixel density.
The Galaxy A71 shoots better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge (2024) has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A71 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.