Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than Motorola Edge (2024), having an 87.7 score against 78.5. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy M51 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge (2024), it must be told that it's also incredibly older, thicker and heavier.
Galaxy M51 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge (2024) features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery life than Motorola Edge (2024), because it has a 40% more battery size.
The Galaxy M51 takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.