Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than Motorola Edge (2024), getting a score of 90.8 against 78.5. Despite being the best we are comparing here, the Galaxy Note 20 construction is a lot older, heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola Edge (2024). The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024). They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Motorola Edge (2024) has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge (2024) features better battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh. Galaxy Note 20 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a camera with much less MP resolution and a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Edge (2024), but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.