Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge (2024), getting a general score of 79.3 against 78.5. These devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is incredibly older than the Motorola Edge (2024), it's body is a little lighter and just a little thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has 4 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels count in each screen inch.
Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge (2024) has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge (2024) also has a way bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a larger camera aperture and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy Note 5 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.