Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14. Galaxy Note10 Lite is a better phone than Motorola Edge (2024), we must highlight that it is also a older, heavier and a little bit thicker phone.
The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a much better display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, a lot smaller back camera sensor providing a lot lower image quality and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.