Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 general score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a much older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier phone than Motorola Edge (2024).
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite worse pixel quantity per screen inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality and a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
The Motorola Edge (2024) features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S20 FE is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.