Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola Edge (2024), getting a 98 score against 78.5. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is much older, heavier and just a little thicker than Motorola Edge (2024).
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge (2024) features a little bit better display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little smaller display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior camera than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a much smaller camera sensor capturing way worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera and a much higher video quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life is just as good as the Motorola Edge (2024) one.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola Edge (2024), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.