Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s general score of 78.5. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also an a lot older, a lot heavier and somewhat thicker phone. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge (2024) has a sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery capacity. Motorola Edge (2024) takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.