Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than Motorola Edge (2024), getting a general score of 88.5 against 78.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge (2024), but it's a little heavier and was released 4 years before.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little worse pixel density, a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge (2024). Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy Z Flip's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as Motorola Edge (2024)'s one, they have the same internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola Edge (2024) feature quite similar cameras, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels, a lower (4K) video quality and a much tinier sensor providing a much worse image quality, they both have the same aperture.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Edge (2024), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Edge (2024). If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Edge (2024), giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.