Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| $ 549.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola Edge (2024), getting a overall score of 92.3 against 78.5. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is somewhat thinner than the Motorola Edge (2024), although it's just a little heavier and was released 4 years before.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge (2024). Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge (2024) features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a camera that's very similar to the camera in Motorola Edge (2024), and although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a worse 3840x2160 video definition, a lot tinier camera sensor shooting lot worse quality videos and images and a lot worse 12 MP resolution back camera, they both have a same size aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games as the Motorola Edge (2024), both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge (2024) features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a bit more money than Motorola Edge (2024), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.