Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Motorola Edge (2024), getting a score of 94.6 against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge (2024), although it is noticeably heavier and was released 4 years before. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola Edge (2024) count with extremely similar memory to store more games and applications, both have equal 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a lot worse resolution and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photographs, they both have a same size aperture.
Motorola Edge (2024) counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Edge (2024), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Edge (2024). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Edge (2024), giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.