Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-06-20 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s general score of 78.5. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a much older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Motorola Edge (2024). Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge (2024) features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola Edge (2024) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S both count with extremely similar batteries, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 5020mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower resolution camera, a worse video quality and a way tinier camera sensor, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.