Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a general score of 82.5 against 78.5. Even though Google Pixel 2 XL is a better device than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, we must highlight that it's also a much older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker device. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little lower pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a little larger screen. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has as much memory for applications and games as Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, they have exactly the same internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.